Here’s an article from the excellent StrangeHarvest. It really made me think, and it has a great title.
Lemon Squeezy: Design Tendencies after the Juicy Salif.

A couple quotes from the article:
…Contemporary design produces devices that are not intended to perform as advertised: as chair, table, lamp or whatever. They are devices whose function is a particular kind of cultural experience…
…If design can no longer be judged by its functional utility, the terms of reference for understanding the success of a design become more complex. Equally, form, composition and other aesthetic qualities are only the means by which an effect is manifested, not ends in themselves. Effect is how the design communicates cultural content and is therefore the primary attribute of contemporary design.
Designs apparent impracticality is not failure; it is the point from which it explores possibilities of contemporary culture (for those who find this a ridiculously pretentious position, there are plenty of products that work). This is why design chairs are almost always more uncomfortable than other kinds of chairs, why design tables are a challenge to use…
To the extent I’ve thought about these things, I pretty much agree with what the author is saying. It seems to me that most designers inherently understand these ideas before starting a project however… You’re never selling the object, you’re always selling the lifestyle and the accessories that come with it. In our current media-saturated culture, isn’t that as natural as breathing?

